{"id":736,"date":"2026-03-18T14:40:38","date_gmt":"2026-03-18T13:40:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/?p=736"},"modified":"2026-03-18T15:03:42","modified_gmt":"2026-03-18T14:03:42","slug":"to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/","title":{"rendered":"To ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Across Europe, calls to restrict children\u2019s access to social media are growing. The choice is not simply between \u201cban or not to ban\u201d. That framing obscures the real issue. What is at stake is whether it is acceptable to have a digital environment built around attention capture, data extraction and profit, despite avoidable harms for children or whether Europe decides to insist on platforms that are safe by default, accountable by design and compatible with children\u2019s rights.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Society already sets age limits when activities pose meaningful risks to children\u2019s health, safety or development. The same logic can apply online: the issue is not whether every child is affected in the same way but whether the overall risk profile of certain mainstream services, combined with their scale and design, justifies protective safeguards. At the same time, if age restrictions become the only answer, there is the risk of a false sense of security: children may move to other platforms, use services without registering or bypass restrictions while the underlying harms remain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those harms are tied to business models and product choices. As evidenced by whistleblowers and wider public reporting, major platforms are engineered to maximise engagement and convert attention into revenue. Infinite scroll, autoplay, persistent notifications, algorithmic amplification and highly personalised feeds are commercial decisions designed to keep users online for longer. This matters because adolescence is a sensitive developmental window and teens are especially sensitive to reward and social comparison, making highly reinforcing environments hard to disengage from.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The \u201c<\/strong>brain rot\u201d phenomenon, an informal label for the cognitive fatigue and reduced focus people report after heavy scrolling, is increasingly echoed in research. For instance, a 2025 systematic<\/a> review and meta-analysis, pooling 71 studies and around 98,000 participants, found that heavier short-form video use was associated with poorer cognitive outcomes, with the strongest links for attention and inhibitory or impulse control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Risk is not only about harmful content online but about how recommender systems steer children towards it and keep them there. A study<\/a> by Amnesty International shows that accounts registered as 13-year-olds are reportedly pushed into depressive and self-harm \u201crabbit holes,\u201d with feeds becoming dominated by mental-health and suicide-related content.\u00a0Harms also spread through what platforms actively recommend. Engagement-based ranking can amplify emotionally charged and polarising content. It notes evidence<\/a> that some systems weigh reaction emojis (including \u201cangry\u201d) more heavily than \u201clikes\u201d. In England and Wales, a large survey<\/a> of 13\u201317-year-olds found 70% encountered real-life violence online in the past year, and among those exposed, one quarter said they saw it because platforms promoted it through feeds and recommendations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0A Dublin City University study<\/a> found it took about 23\u201326 minutes of watching for new young male accounts to be recommended toxic or misogynistic content on some social media. Related research argues that recommender dynamics can contribute not only to exposure to discriminatory content but also to normalisation<\/strong>, with the manosphere, including misogynistic narratives framed as entertainment, advice or \u201cself-help.\u2019\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Image-based platforms can sharpen the focus on appearance, especially when edited images are treated as everyday norms and paired with public metrics such as likes and follower counts. When recommender systems prioritise engagement over reliability and synthetic content blurs the line between evidence and fabrication, children\u2019s ability to seek, receive and trust information is also undermined. Current evidence suggests that girls are disproportionately exposed to appearance-focused content linked to thinness and dieting, while boys are increasingly exposed to content promoting muscularity and performance ideals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Taken together, these findings point to one conclusion: platform accountability is essential, whatever the policy choice on age access. If restrictions are introduced, they should be necessary and proportionate while being accompanied by broader protections and realistic alternatives for children\u2019s participation and support.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They must never become an excuse to avoid regulating design. Core safeguards should include safe-by-default settings, limits on engagement-maximising features, transparency around recommender systems, robust risk assessment and independent scrutiny as well aseffective enforcement of existing European Union rules,\u00a0 including the digital services act, the general data protection regulation (GDPR)\u00a0 and the artificial intelligence act, alongside new measures to tackle dark patterns and exploitative personalisation. Even where age-based access conditions exist, platforms must be designed to uphold the rights of all children under 18.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Social media can also offer connection, expression, creativity and participation. But this also points to an uncomfortable reality: platforms have filled gaps that should never have been left open. When children turn to social media for support or a sense of belonging, it may reflect the absence of safe community spaces, youth services, mental health support and opportunities to be heard elsewhere. Governments are responsible for ensuring these conditions and protecting children\u2019s rights under the United Nations convention on the rights of the child and should not outsource this to companies.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So yes, it is reasonable to scrutinise whether some services should be accessible to children in the same way they are now. But this should lead to a structural shift away from business models that profit from children\u2019s vulnerabilities and towards a digital environment that protects children\u2019s rights by design. If the European Union is serious about children\u2019s safety online, then it has to move beyond the ban debate. The real challenge is not simply deciding who should be allowed onto social media but what kind of social media are allowed at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Francesca Pisanu<\/strong> is the European Union advocacy officer at Eurochild, where she informs and influences European policy and legislation to advance children\u2019s rights across Europe. Her work focuses in particular on children\u2019s rights in the digital environment, alongside broader human rights and social issues affecting children, with a particular emphasis on those in vulnerable situations. She holds an advanced Master of Laws in International Children\u2019s Rights from Leiden University and has more than five years of experience in supporting human rights in Europe and beyond<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For more information on Eurochild\u2019s position on age restrictions on social media, please click here<\/a>.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Across Europe, calls to restrict children\u2019s access to social media are growing. The choice is not simply between \u201cban or not to ban\u201d. That framing obscures the real issue. What is at stake is whether it is acceptable to have a digital environment built around attention capture, data extraction and profit, despite avoidable harms for […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"coauthors":[31],"class_list":["post-736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nTo ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake - Evidence Hub on Social Media Ban for Kids<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"To ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake - Evidence Hub on Social Media Ban for Kids\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Across Europe, calls to restrict children\u2019s access to social media are growing. The choice is not simply between \u201cban or not to ban\u201d. That framing obscures the real issue. What is at stake is whether it is acceptable to have a digital environment built around attention capture, data extraction and profit, despite avoidable harms for […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Evidence Hub on Social Media Ban for Kids\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/thelisboncouncil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-18T13:40:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-18T14:03:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Francesca Pisanu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@lisboncouncil\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@lisboncouncil\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Francesca Pisanu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Francesca Pisanu\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fc54a79f4404ee917a4257f1cf464e26\"},\"headline\":\"To ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-18T13:40:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-18T14:03:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/\"},\"wordCount\":1010,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"Uncategorized\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/\",\"name\":\"To ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake - Evidence Hub on Social Media Ban for Kids\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-18T13:40:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-18T14:03:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fc54a79f4404ee917a4257f1cf464e26\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"To ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Evidence Hub on Social Media Ban for Kids\",\"description\":\"A Lisbon Council initiative\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fc54a79f4404ee917a4257f1cf464e26\",\"name\":\"Francesca Pisanu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/ae406d06589dbb41faed2e0eff267c33\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/francesca-pisanu-96x96.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/francesca-pisanu-96x96.jpeg\",\"caption\":\"Francesca Pisanu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/author\/guest02\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"To ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake - Evidence Hub on Social Media Ban for Kids","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"To ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake - Evidence Hub on Social Media Ban for Kids","og_description":"Across Europe, calls to restrict children\u2019s access to social media are growing. The choice is not simply between \u201cban or not to ban\u201d. That framing obscures the real issue. What is at stake is whether it is acceptable to have a digital environment built around attention capture, data extraction and profit, despite avoidable harms for […]","og_url":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/","og_site_name":"Evidence Hub on Social Media Ban for Kids","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/thelisboncouncil\/","article_published_time":"2026-03-18T13:40:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-18T14:03:42+00:00","author":"Francesca Pisanu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@lisboncouncil","twitter_site":"@lisboncouncil","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Francesca Pisanu","Estimated reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/"},"author":{"name":"Francesca Pisanu","@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fc54a79f4404ee917a4257f1cf464e26"},"headline":"To ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake","datePublished":"2026-03-18T13:40:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-18T14:03:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/"},"wordCount":1010,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["Uncategorized"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/","url":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/","name":"To ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake - Evidence Hub on Social Media Ban for Kids","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-03-18T13:40:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-18T14:03:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fc54a79f4404ee917a4257f1cf464e26"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/to-ban-or-not-to-ban-lets-focus-on-whats-at-stake\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"To ban or not to ban?\u00a0Let\u2019s\u00a0focus on\u00a0what\u2019s\u00a0at stake"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/","name":"Evidence Hub on Social Media Ban for Kids","description":"A Lisbon Council initiative","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fc54a79f4404ee917a4257f1cf464e26","name":"Francesca Pisanu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/ae406d06589dbb41faed2e0eff267c33","url":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/francesca-pisanu-96x96.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/francesca-pisanu-96x96.jpeg","caption":"Francesca Pisanu"},"url":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/author\/guest02\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=736"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":778,"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736\/revisions\/778"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=736"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socialmediaban.lisboncouncil.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}